It is proposed that part 63, chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 101, 112, 114, 116, and 301 of the
Clean Air Act as amended by Pub. L. 101-549 (42 U.S.C. 7401,
7412, 7414, 7416, 7601).
2. By adding a new Subpart KK to read as follows:
Subpart KK -- National Emission Standards for the Printing
and Publishing Industry.
Sec.
63.820 Overview of Subpart KK.
63.821 Applicability and designation of affected sources.
63.822 Definitions.
63.823 Standards: General.
63.824 Standards: Publication rotogravure printing.
63.825 Standards: Packaging and product rotogravure and
wide-web flexographic printing.
63.826 Compliance dates.
63.827 Performance test methods.
63.828 Monitoring requirements.
63.829 Recordkeeping requirements.
63.830 Reporting requirements.
63.831 Delegation of Authority
63.832 - 63.839 Reserved.
Subpart KK - National Emission Standards for the Printing
and Publishing Industry
63.820 Overview of Subpart KK.
Table 1 provides an overview of this subpart, with
cross-references to the specific paragraphs of the subpart.
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SUBPART KK OF 40 CFR 63 - NATIONAL
EMISSION STANDARDS FOR THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY
AFFECTED
SOURCE REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION Printing and
Publishing
Industry
Applicability This rule applies to facilities
engaged in rotogravure and
wide-web flexographic printing
that are major sources as
defined in 40 CFR part 63.
(63.821) Estimated
Number of
Facilities: Approximately 200 facilities
are expected to be affected by
the rule. Applicable SIC codes
include 2295, 2392, 2647, 2649,
2651, 2671, 2673, 2674, 2711,
2721, 2754, 2759, 3497, and
3996. Permit
Requirements: Major sources are required to
obtain operating permits in
State where facility is located
according to 40 CFR part 70 and
applicable State regulations.
(63.821(d)) All Affected
Sources Standards Comply with 63.4 through
63.6 of the General Provisions
of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A,
except for 63.6(h). (63.823) Compliance
Dates Within three years of the
effective date for existing
sources and upon startup for
new sources. (63.826) Test Methods
and Procedures See individual affected
sources. Monitoring
Requirements See individual affected
sources. All Affected
Sources
(cont.) Recordkeeping
Requirements Comply with 63.10(b) and (c)
of the General Provisions.
(63.829) Reporting
Requirements Initial notification,
notification of performance
tests, notification of
compliance status, performance
test reports, startup, shutdown
and malfunction reports,
summary reports, and HAP use
reports as described in
63.9-63.10. (63.830) Publication
Rotogravure
Facilities Standards Control of 92 percent of
organic HAP or equivalent.
(Organic HAP emissions limited
to no greater than 8 percent of
the mass of volatile matter,
including water, used on a
plantwide basis.) (63.824(b)) Performance
Test Period
and Tests
1. Test Period. Each and every
month. (63.824(b))
2. Performance Test. Initial
performance test for all
control devices to demonstrate
compliance with overall control
efficiency requirement.
(63.824(b)) Test Methods
and Procedures
1. Organic HAP content
determination. (63.827(b)(1))
2. Volatile matter content
determination. (63.827(c)(1)) Publication
Rotogravure
(cont.)
Test Methods
and Procedures
(cont.)
3. Overall control efficiency
using liquid-liquid mass
balance for solvent recovery
systems. (63.824(b)(1)(i).
4. Overall control efficiency
determination using capture
efficiency test with continuous
emission monitors.
(63.824(b)(1)(ii) and
63.824(b)(2)(ii))
5. Overall control efficiency
determination using capture
efficiency test and incinerator
destruction efficiency test.
(63.824(b)(2)(i). Monitoring
Requirements 1. Hourly recording of flow
rate from press to control
device. (63.828(a)(1)
2. Quarterly audit of
continuous emission monitors.
(63.828(a)(2)(i)).
3. Monitoring of capture system
operating parameter.
(63.828(a)(5)) Product and
Packaging
Rotogravure
Presses and
Wide-web
Flexographic
Presses, or
Groups of
Presses
Controlled
by a Common
Solvent
Recovery
System Standards
Control of 95 percent of
organic HAP, or organic HAP
emissions limited to no greater
than 0.20 kg HAP per kg of
solids applied, for each press,
or group of presses controlled
by a common solvent recovery
system, or organic HAP
emissions limited to no greater
than 0.04 kg HAP per kg inks
and other materials applied,
for each press. (63.825(b)) Product and
Packaging
Rotogravure
Presses and
Wide-web
Flexographic
Presses
(cont.) Performance
Test Period
and Tests 1. Test Period.
Uncontrolled Presses. Each and
every month.
Presses controlled with solvent
recovery systems. Each and
every month.
Presses controlled with
incinerators monitoring
operating parameters. Every
three hour period.
Presses controlled with
incinerators using continuous
emissions monitors. Each and
every month. (63.825(b) and
(c))
2. Performance Test. Initial
performance test for all
control devices to demonstrate
compliance with organic HAP
emission rate. (63.825(g) and
(h)) Test Methods
and Procedures 1. Organic HAP content
determination. (63.827(b)(2))
2. Volatile matter and solids
content determination.
(63.827(c)(2))
3. Overall control efficiency
using liquid-liquid mass
balance for solvent recovery
systems. (63.825(g)
4. Overall control efficiency
determination using capture
efficiency test with continuous
emission monitors.
(63.825(g)(2) and 63.825(h)(2))
5. Overall control efficiency
determination using capture
efficiency test and incinerator
destruction efficiency test.
(63.825(h)). Product and
Packaging
Rotogravure
Presses and
Wide-web
Flexographic
Presses
(cont.) Monitoring
Requirements 1. Hourly recording of flow
rate from press to control
device. (63.828(a)(1))
2. Quarterly audit of
continuous emission monitors.
(63.828(a)(2)(i))
3. Quarterly calibration of
incinerator monitoring
thermocouple(s).
(63.828(2)(ii))
4. Operation of continuous
emission monitors.
(63.828(a)(3))
5. Measurement of incinerator
operating parameters.
(63.828(a)(4))
6. Monitoring of capture system
operating parameter.
(63.828(a)(5))
63.821 Applicability and designation of affected sources.
(a) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this
section, the provisions of this subpart apply to:
(1) Each new and existing facility at which publication
rotogravure, product or packaging rotogravure, or wide-web
flexographic printing presses are operated that is located
at a plant site that is a major source of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) as defined in 40 CFR Part 63.2, and
(2) Each new and existing facility at which publication
rotogravure, product or packaging rotogravure, or wide-web
flexographic printing presses are operated for which the
owner or operator commits, for purposes of establishing the
facility to be an area source with respect to this subpart,
to use less than 9.1 Mg (10 tons) per each 12 month period
of each HAP and less than 22.7 Mg (25 tons) per each 12
month period of any combination of HAP at the facility,
including materials used for source categories or purposes
other than printing and publishing.
(3) Each facility for which the owner or operator
commits to and meets the criteria stated in paragraph (a)(2)
shall be considered an area source, and is subject only to
the provisions of 63.829(d) and 63.830(d) of this
subpart.
(4) Each facility for which the owner or operator
commits to the conditions in paragraph (a)(2) may exclude
material used in routine janitorial or facility grounds
maintenance, personal uses by employees or other persons,
the use of products for the purpose of maintaining motor
vehicles operated by the facility, and the use of HAP
contained in intake water (used for processing or noncontact
cooling) or intake air (used either as compressed air or for
combustion).
(5) Each facility for which the owner or operator
commits to the conditions in paragraph (a)(2) that exceeds
either of the HAP use thresholds in paragraph (a)(2) for any
12 month period shall be considered in violation of its
commitment for that 12 month period and shall be considered
a major source of HAP beginning the first month after the
end of the first 12 month period in which either of the HAP
use thresholds was exceeded. As a major source of HAP, each
such facility would be subject to the provisions of this
subpart as noted in paragraph (a)(1) and would no longer be
eligible to use the provisions of paragraph (a)(2), even if
in subsequent 12 month periods the facility uses less HAP
than the thresholds in paragraph (a)(2).
(b) This subpart does not apply to research or
laboratory facilities that are not collocated with
production rotogravure or production wide-web flexographic
presses.
(c) The affected sources subject to this standard are:
(1) All of the publication rotogravure presses present
at a given location, and all affiliated equipment, including
proof presses, cylinder and parts cleaners, ink and solvent
mixing and storage equipment, and solvent recovery
equipment, and
(2) Each packaging or product rotogravure press, or
wide-web flexographic press, except for proof presses; or,
as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, each group of
packaging and product rotogravure presses and wide-web
flexographic presses controlled by a common solvent recovery
system.
(d) An owner or operator of an affected source subject
to this subpart shall obtain an operating permit from the
permitting authority in the State where the source is
located. The owner or operator shall apply for such permit
in accordance with the regulations contained in part 70 of
this chapter and in applicable State regulations. If a
state wherein the affected source is located does not have
an approved permitting program, the owner or operator of an
affected source must submit a part 71 permit application if
required under 40 CFR part 71. These standards are
enforceable regardless of the status of an individual
source's Title V permit.
(e) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this
section packaging or product rotogravure press or wide-web
flexographic press can be included in a group of presses
controlled by a common solvent recovery system if the
solvent recovery system is not used to control emissions
from any operations other than packaging or product
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic presses.
63.822 Definitions.
(a) All terms used in this subpart that are not defined
below have the meaning given to them in the Clean Air Act
and in Subpart A of this part.
Capture efficiency means the fraction of all organic
HAP emissions generated by a process that are directed to a
control device, expressed as a percentage.
Capture system means a hood, enclosed room, or other
means of collecting organic HAP emissions into a closed-vent
system that exhausts to a control device.
Control device means a device such as a carbon adsorber
or incinerator which reduces the organic HAP in an exhaust
gas by collection and subsequent recovery or by destruction.
The control device does not affect the process being
controlled and thus is an "add-on" technology as opposed to
a scheme to control HAP emissions through making some
alteration to the basic process.
Control device efficiency means the ratio of organic
HAP emissions collected and recovered or destroyed by a
control device to the total HAP emissions that are
introduced into the control device, expressed as a
percentage.
Day means a 24-consecutive-hour period.
Flexographic press means a series of individual print
stations oriented vertically, horizontally, or around the
circumference of a single large impression cylinder. The
image (type and art) to be printed is raised above the
printing plate and the image carrier is made of rubber or
other elastomeric materials. Inboard and outboard print
stations, including those employing any other technology,
such as rotogravure are included if they are capable of
printing or coating on the same continuous web or substrate
which is fed from a continuous roll.
HAP applied means the organic HAP content of all inks,
coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvent and other
materials applied to a substrate by a printing press.
HAP used means the organic HAP applied, all organic HAP
used for cleaning, parts washing, proof presses, and all
organic HAP emitted during tank loading, ink mixing, and
storage.
Month means a calendar month or a prespecified period
of 28 days or 35 days (utilizing a 4-4-5-week recordkeeping
and reporting schedule).
Overall HAP control efficiency means the total
efficiency of the control system, determined either (1) by
the product of the capture efficiency and the control device
efficiency or (2) by a liquid-liquid material balance around
each affected source and associated control device.
Product and packaging rotogravure printing means the
production, on a rotogravure press, of any printed substrate
not otherwise defined as publication rotogravure printing.
This includes, but is not limited to, folding cartons,
flexible packaging, labels and wrappers, gift wraps, wall
and floor coverings, upholstery, decorative laminates and
tissue products.
Proof press means any device used only to check the
quality of the image formation of rotogravure cylinders or
flexographic plates, which prints only non-saleable items.
Publication rotogravure facility means all of the
publication rotogravure presses present at a given location,
and all affiliated equipment, including proof presses,
cylinder and parts cleaners, ink and solvent mixing and
storage equipment, and solvent recovery equipment.
Publication rotogravure printing means the production,
on a rotogravure press, of the following saleable paper
products:
Catalogues, including mail order and premium,
Direct mail advertisements, including circulars,
letters, pamphlets, cards, and printed envelopes,
Display advertisements, including general posters,
outdoor advertisements, car cards, window posters; counter
and floor displays; point of purchase and other printed
display material,
Magazines,
Miscellaneous advertisements, including brochures,
pamphlets, catalog sheets, circular folders, announcements,
package inserts, book jackets, market circulars, magazine
inserts, and shopping news,
Newspapers, magazine and comic supplements for
newspapers, and preprinted newspaper inserts, including hi-
fi and spectacolor rolls and sections,
Periodicals, and
Telephone and other directories, including business
reference services.
Research or laboratory facility means any stationary
source whose primary purpose is to conduct research and
development of new processes and products, where such source
is operated under the close supervision of technically
trained personnel and is not engaged in the manufacture of
products for commercial sale in commerce, except in a de
minimis manner.
Rotogravure press means a series of one or more work
stations, each station consisting of a cylinder, ink supply,
and dryer. The image (type and art) to be printed is etched
or engraved below the surface of a cylinder. On a
rotogravure cylinder the printing image consists of millions
of minute cells. Inboard and outboard print stations
including those employing any other technology, such as
flexography, are included if they are capable of printing or
coating on the same continuous web or substrate which is fed
from a continuous roll.
Wide-web flexographic press means a flexographic press
capable of printing substrates greater than 18 inches in
width.
(b) The symbols used in equations in this subpart are
defined as follows:
(1) Chi = the organic HAP content of ink or other
material, i, expressed as a weight fraction,
kg/kg.
(2) Ci = the organic volatile matter concentration in
ppm, dry basis, of compound i in the vent gas, as
determined by Method 25 or Method 25A.
(3) Csi = the solids content of ink or other material,
i, expressed as a weight fraction, kg/kg.
(4) Cvi =the volatile matter content of ink or other
material, i, expressed as a weight fraction,
kg/kg.
(5) E = the organic volatile matter control efficiency
of the control device, percent.
(6) F = the organic volatile matter capture efficiency
of the capture system, percent.
(7) L = the mass organic HAP emission rate per mass of
solids applied, kg/kg.
(8) Ma = the mass of inks and other materials applied
by an affected source in a month, kg.
(9) Mf = the total organic volatile matter mass flow
rate, kg/h.
(10) Mfo = the organic volatile matter mass flow rate
at the outlet of the control device, kg/h.
(11) Mfi = the organic volatile matter mass flow rate
at the inlet to the control device, kg/h.
(12) Mha = the mass of organic HAP applied in a month,
kg.
(13) Mhr = the mass of organic HAP recovered in a
month, kg.
(14) Mhu = the mass of organic HAP used in a month, kg.
(15) Mi = the mass of ink or other material, i, applied
in a month, kg.
(16) Msa = the mass of solids applied in a month, kg.
(17) Mvr = the mass of volatile matter recovered in a
month, kg.
(18) Mvu = the mass of volatile matter, including
water, used in a month, kg.
(19) MWi = the molecular weight of compound i in the
vent gas, kg/kg-mol.
(20) n = the number of organic compounds in the vent
gas.
(21) p = the number of different inks, coatings,
varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents and other
materials applied in a month.
(22) Rv = the organic volatile matter collection and
recovery efficiency, percent.
(23) Qsd = the volumetric flow rate of gases entering
or exiting the control device, as determined by
Method 2, dscm/h.
(24) R = the overall organic HAP control efficiency,
percent.
(25) S = the mass organic HAP emission rate per mass of
material applied, kg/kg.
(26) 0.0416 = conversion factor for molar volume, kg-
mol/m3(@ 293 K and 760 mmHg).
63.823 Standards: General.
Table 2 provides cross references to the 40 CFR part
63, subpart A, general provisions, indicating the
applicability of the general provisions requirements to
subpart KK.
TABLE 2. APPLICABILITY OF 40 CFR PART 63 GENERAL PROVISIONS
TO SUBPART KK
General
Provisions
Reference Applicable
to
Subpart KK
Comment
63.1(a)(1) Yes 63.1(a)(2) Yes 63.1(a)(3) Yes 63.1(a)(4) Yes 63.1(a)(5) No Section reserved 63.1(a)(6)-
(a)(8) No 63.1(a)(9) No Section reserved 63.1(a)(10) Yes 63.1(a)(11) Yes 63.1(a)(12) -
(a)(14) Yes 63.1(b)(1) No Subpart KK specifies
applicability 63.1(b)(2) Yes 63.1(b)(3) Yes 63.1(c)(1) Yes 63.1(c)(2) No Area sources are not
subject to subpart KK 63.1(c)(3) No Section reserved 63.1(c)(4) Yes 63.1(c)(5) No 63.1(d) No Section reserved 63.1(e) Yes 63.2 Yes Additional definitions in
subpart KK 63.3(a)-(c) Yes 63.4(a)(1)-
(a)(3) Yes 63.4(a)(4) No Section reserved 63.4(a)(5) Yes 63.4(b) Yes 63.4(c) Yes 63.5(a)(1) Yes 63.5(a)(2) Yes 63.5(b)(1) Yes 63.5(b)(2) No Section reserved 63.5(b)(3) Yes 63.5(b)(4) Yes 63.5(b)(5) Yes 63.5(b)(6) Yes 63.5(c) No Section reserved 63.5(d)(1) Yes 63.5(d)(2) Yes 63.5(d)(3) Yes 63.5(d)(4) Yes 63.5(e) Yes 63.5(f)(1) Yes 63.5(f)(2) Yes 63.6(a) Yes 63.6(b)(1) Yes 63.6(b)(2) Yes 63.6(b)(3) Yes 63.6(b)(4) Yes 63.6(b)(5) Yes 63.6(b)(6) No Section reserved 63.6(b)(7) Yes 63.6(c)(1) Yes 63.6(c)(2) Yes 63.6(c)(3)-
(c)(4) No Sections reserved 63.6(c)(5) Yes 63.6(d) No Section reserved 63.6(e) Yes 63.6(f)(1) Yes 63.6(f)(2) Yes 63.6(f)(3) Yes 63.6(g) Yes 63.6(h) No Subpart KK does not require
COMS 63.6(i)(1)-
(i)(14) Yes 63.6(i)(15) No Section reserved 63.6(i)(16) Yes 63.6(j) Yes 63.7(a)(1) Yes 63.7(a)(2) Yes 63.7(a)(3) Yes 63.7(b) Yes 63.7(c) Yes 63.7(d) Yes 63.7(e)(1) Yes 63.7(e)(2) Yes 63.7(e)(3) Yes 63.7(e)(4) Yes 63.7(f) Yes 63.7(g) Yes 63.7(h) Yes 63.8(a)(1) Yes 63.8(a)(2) Yes 63.8(a)(3) No Section reserved 63.8(a)(4) No Subpart KK specifies the use
of solvent recovery devices
or incinerators 63.8(b)(1) Yes 63.8(b)(2) Yes 63.8(b)(3) Yes 63.8(c)(1) Yes 63.8(c)(2) Yes 63.8(c)(3) Yes 63.8(c)(4) No Subpart KK specifies CMS
sampling requirements 63.8(c)(5)-
(c)(8) Yes 63.8(d) Yes 63.8(e) Yes 63.8(f)(1)-
(f)(5) Yes 63.8(f)(6) Yes 63.8(g) No Subpart KK specifies CMS
data reduction requirements 63.9(a) Yes 63.9(b)(1) Yes 63.9(b)(2) Yes 63.9(b)(3) Yes 63.9(b)(4) Yes 63.9(b)(5) Yes 63.9(c) Yes 63.9(d) Yes 63.9(e) Yes 63.9(f) No Subpart KK does not require
opacity and visible
emissions observations 63.9(g) Yes 63.9(h)(1)-
(h)(3) Yes 63.9(h)(4) No Section reserved 63.9(h)(5)-
(h)(6) Yes 63.9(i) Yes 63.9(j) Yes 63.10(a) Yes 63.10(b)(1) Yes 63.10(b)(2) Yes 63.10(b)(3) Yes 63.10(c)(1) Yes 63.10(c)(2)-
(c)(4) No Sections reserved 63.10(c)(5)-
(c)(8) Yes 63.10(c)(9) No Section reserved 63.10(c)(10)-
(c)(15) Yes 63.10(d)(1) Yes 63.10(d)(2) Yes 63.10(d)(3) No Subpart KK does not require
opacity and visible
emissions observations 63.10(d)(4) Yes 63.10(d)(5) Yes 63.10(e) Yes 63.10(f) Yes 63.11(a)-(b) No Subpart KK specifies the use
of solvent recovery devices
or incinerators. 63.12(a)-(c) Yes 63.13(a)-(c) Yes 63.14(a)-(b) Yes 63.15(a)-(b) Yes
63.824 Standards: Publication rotogravure printing.
(a) Each owner or operator of any publication
rotogravure printing facility that is subject to the
requirements of this subpart shall comply with these
requirements on and after the compliance dates as specified
in 63.826 of this subpart.
(b) Each publication rotogravure facility shall limit
emissions of organic HAP to no more than 8 percent of the
total volatile matter used. The emission limitation may be
achieved by capture and control of at least 92 percent of
organic HAP used, by substitution of non-HAP materials for
organic HAP, or by a combination of capture and control
technologies and substitution of materials. To demonstrate
compliance with the overall organic HAP control efficiency
requirement, each owner or operator shall follow the
procedure in paragraph (b)(1) of this section when emissions
from the affected source are controlled by a solvent
recovery device or the procedure in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section when emissions from the affected source are
controlled by an incinerator.
(1) To demonstrate compliance, each owner or operator
using a solvent recovery device to control emissions shall
show the overall HAP limitation achieved by one of the
following two procedures, either:
(i) Perform a liquid-liquid material balance for each
and every month as follows:
(A) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material used in the
facility during the month;
(B) Determine the organic HAP content of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material used during the month following the procedure in
63.827(b)(1);
(C) Determine the volatile matter content, including
water, of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer,
solvent and other material used during the month following
the procedure in 63.827(c)(1);
(D) Install, calibrate, maintain and operate, according
to the manufacturer's specifications, a device that
indicates the cumulative amount of volatile matter recovered
by the solvent recovery device on a monthly basis. The
device shall be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate
to within +2.0 percent;
(E) Measure the amount of volatile matter recovered for
the month; and
(F) Calculate the overall organic HAP control
efficiency (R) for the month using the following equation:
(G) The affected source is in compliance if R is at
least 92 percent each month; or
(ii) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an
initial performance test of capture efficiency, and
continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to
assure capture efficiency as follows:
(A) Install continuous emission monitors to determine
the total organic volatile matter mass flow rate (e. g. by
determining the concentration of the vent gas in grams per
cubic meter, and the volumetric flow rate in cubic meters
per second, such that the total organic volatile matter mass
flow rate in grams per second can be calculated and summed)
at both the inlet to and the outlet from the control device,
in accordance with the requirements of 63.828(a), such
that the percent control efficiency (E) of the control
device can be calculated for each month;
(B) Determine the percent capture efficiency (F) of the
capture system according to 63.827(e);
(C) Calculate the overall organic HAP control
efficiency (R) achieved for each month using the following
equation:
(D) Install, calibrate, operate and maintain the
instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-
specific operating parameter established in accordance with
63.828(a)(5) whenever HAP from publication rotogravure
printing operations are vented from the capture system.
(E) The affected source is in compliance with the
requirement if R is at least 92 percent each month, and the
capture device is operated at an average value greater than,
or less than (as appropriate) the operating parameter value
established in accordance with 63.828(a)(5) for each 3-
hour period.
(2) To demonstrate compliance, each owner or operator
using an incinerator to control emissions shall show the
overall HAP control efficiency achieved by one of the
following two procedures:
(i) Demonstrate initial compliance through performance
tests and continuing compliance through continuous
monitoring as follows:
(A) Determine the incinerator destruction efficiency
(E) using the procedure in 63.827(d);
(B) Determine the capture system capture efficiency (F)
using the procedure in 63.827(e);
(D) Calculate the overall HAP control efficiency (R)
achieved using Equation 2;
(E) The affected source is in initial compliance if R
is at least 92 percent. Demonstration of continuing
compliance is achieved by continuous monitoring of an
appropriate incinerator operating parameter in accordance
with 63.828(a)(4), and by continuous monitoring of an
appropriate capture system monitoring parameter in
accordance with 63.828(a)(5). The affected source is in
continuing compliance if the capture device is operated at
an average value greater than or less than (as appropriate)
the operating parameter value established in accordance with
63.828(a)(5), and,
(1) an incinerator other than catalytic incinerator is
used and the average combustion temperature for all 3-hour
periods is greater than or equal to the average combustion
temperature established under 63.827(d); or
(2) a catalytic incinerator is used and the average
catalyst bed inlet temperature for all 3-hour periods is
greater than or equal to the average catalyst bed inlet
temperature established in accordance with 63.827(d), and
the average catalyst bed outlet temperature for all 3-hour
periods is greater than or equal to the average catalyst bed
outlet temperature established in accordance with
63.827(d), or,
(ii) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an
initial performance test of capture efficiency, and
continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to
assure capture efficiency in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section.
63.825 Standards: Packaging and product rotogravure and
wide-web flexographic printing.
(a) Each owner or operator of any packaging or product
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic printing press that is
subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply
with these requirements on and after the compliance dates as
specified in 63.826 of this subpart.
(b) Each packaging or product rotogravure press that
applies inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers,
solvents and other materials containing,
(1) more than an average of 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg
solids applied as determined using the procedures in
63.825(e); and,
(2) more than an average of 0.04 kg organic HAP per kg
inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents and
other materials applied as determined using the procedures
in 63.825(f), shall comply with the requirements of
63.825(c).
(c) Each packaging or product rotogravure press or wide
web flexographic press, or group of presses controlled by a
common solvent recovery system subject to this paragraph as
determined by 63.825(b) shall achieve,
(1) an overall organic HAP control efficiency of 95
percent; or,
(2) an organic HAP emissions emission rate of 0.20 kg
organic HAP per kg of solids applied.
(d) To demonstrate compliance each owner or operator
shall,
(1) follow the procedure in paragraph (e) of this
section to determine whether compliance with the organic HAP
threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(1) is achieved so that
emission controls are not required; and,
(2) follow the procedure in paragraph (f) of this
section to determine whether compliance with the organic HAP
threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(2) is achieved so that
emission controls are not required.
(3) If emission controls are needed to achieve
compliance with the overall organic HAP control efficiency
requirement or the HAP emission rate requirement, the owner
or operator shall follow the procedure in paragraph (g) of
this section when emissions from the affected source are
controlled by a solvent recovery device or the procedure in
paragraph (h) of this section when emissions from the
affected source are controlled by an incinerator.
(e) To demonstrate compliance with the organic HAP
threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(1), each owner or
operator of a packaging or product rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing press shall determine for each and
every month the mass organic HAP emission rate per mass of
solids applied, of all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives,
primers, solvents and other materials applied as follows:
(1) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the
press during the month;
(2) Determine the organic HAP content of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material applied on the press during the month following the
procedure in 63.827(b)(2);
(3) Determine the solids content (by weight) of each
ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material applied on the press during the month following the
procedure in 63.827(c)(2);
(4) Calculate the mass of HAP applied during the month
using the following equation,
(5) Calculate the mass of solids applied during the
month using the following equation,
(6) The affected source is in compliance with the HAP
threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(1) if L, as determined
by equation 5,
is less than or equal to 0.20 kg per kg of solids applied.
(f) To demonstrate compliance with the organic HAP
threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(2), each owner or
operator of a packaging or product rotogravure or wide-web
flexographic printing press shall determine for each and
every month the mass organic HAP emission rate per mass of
all inks, coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents
and other materials applied as follows:
(1) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the
press during the month;
(2) Determine the organic HAP content of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material applied on the press during the month following the
procedure in 63.827(b)(2);
(3) Calculate the mass of HAP applied during the month
using the following equation,
(4) Calculate the mass of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents and other materials applied
during the month using equation 7,
(5) The affected source is in compliance with the
organic HAP threshold requirement in 63.825(b)(2) if S, as
determined by equation 8,
is less than or equal to 0.04 kg per kg of solids applied.
(g) To demonstrate compliance with the overall HAP
control efficiency requirement in 63.825(c)(1) or the
overall HAP emissions rate requirement in 63.825(c)(2),
each owner or operator using a solvent recovery device to
control emissions shall show compliance by one of the
following two procedures, either:
(1) Perform a liquid-liquid material balance for each
and every month as follows:
(i) Measure the mass of each ink, coating, varnish,
adhesive, primer, solvent and other material applied on the
press or group of presses controlled by a common solvent
recovery device during the month;
(ii) Determine the organic HAP content of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material applied during the month following the procedure in
63.827(b)(2);
(iii) Determine the volatile matter and solids content
of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and
other material applied during the month following the
procedure in 63.827(c)(2);
(iv) Install, calibrate, maintain and operate,
according to the manufacturer's specifications, a device
that indicates the cumulative amount of volatile matter
recovered by the solvent recovery device on a monthly basis.
The device shall be certified by the manufacturer to be
accurate to within + 2.0 percent;
(v) Measure the amount of volatile matter recovered for
the month; and
(vi) Calculate the volatile matter collection and
recovery efficiency, Rv, using equation 9,
(vii) Calculate the overall HAP emission rate, L, for
the month using equation 10,
(viii) The affected source is in compliance with the
requirement if,
(A) the organic volatile matter collection and recovery
efficiency, Rv, is 95 percent or greater, or
(B) L is 0.20 kg organic HAP per kg solids applied or
less each month; or
(2) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an
initial performance test of capture efficiency, and
continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to
assure capture efficiency, as follows:
(i) Install continuous emission monitors to determine
the total organic volatile matter concentration at both the
inlet to and the outlet from the control device, in
accordance with the requirements of
63.827(a), such that the percent efficiency (E) of the
control device can be calculated for each month;
(ii) Install, calibrate, operate and maintain the
instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-
specific operating parameter established in accordance with
63.828(a)(5) whenever HAP are vented from the capture
system.
(iii) Determine the capture system capture efficiency
(F) using the procedure in 63.827(e);
(iv) Calculate the overall organic HAP emission rate,
(L), achieved for each month using equation 11:
(v) Calculate the overall organic HAP control
efficiency, (R), achieved for each month using equation 12:
(vi) The affected source is in compliance if the
capture device is operated at an average value greater than
or less than (as appropriate) the operating parameter value
established in accordance with 63.828(a)(5) for each three
hour period, and,
(A) L is 0.20 kg HAP per kg solids applied or less each
month, or
(B) R is 95 percent or greater each month.
(h) To demonstrate compliance with the overall HAP
control efficiency requirement in 63.825(c)(1) or the
overall HAP emission rate requirement in 63.825(c)(2),
each owner or operator using an incinerator to control
emissions shall show compliance by one of the following two
procedures:
(1) Demonstrate initial compliance through performance
tests and continuing compliance through continuous
monitoring as follows:
(i) Determine the incinerator destruction efficiency
(E) using the procedure in 63.827(d);
(ii) Determine the capture system capture efficiency
(F) using the procedure in 63.827(e);
(iii) Calculate the overall HAP emission rate (L),
achieved using Equation 11;
(iv) Calculate the overall HAP control efficiency, (R),
achieved using Equation 12;
(v) Install, calibrate, operate and maintain the
instrumentation necessary to measure continuously the site-
specific operating parameter established in accordance with
63.828(a)(5) whenever organic HAP is vented from the
capture system;
(vi) The affected source is in initial compliance if L
is 0.20 kg HAP per kg solids applied or less, or if R is 95
percent or greater. Demonstration of continuing compliance
is achieved by continuous monitoring of an appropriate
incinerator operating parameter in accordance with
63.828(a)(4) and by continuous monitoring of an
appropriate capture system monitoring parameter in
accordance with 63.828(a)(5). The affected source is in
continuing compliance if the capture device is operated at
an average value greater than or less than (as appropriate)
the operating parameter value established in accordance with
63.828(a)(5) for each three hour period, and,
(A) an incinerator other than catalytic incinerator is
used and the average combustion temperature for all 3-hour
periods is greater than or equal to the average combustion
temperature established under 63.827(d); or
(B) a catalytic incinerator is used and the average
combustion bed inlet temperatures for all 3-hour periods are
greater than or equal to the average combustion temperatures
established in accordance with 63.827(d), and the average
combustion bed outlet temperatures for all 3-hour periods
are greater than or equal to the average combustion
temperatures established in accordance with 63.827(d); or
(2) Use continuous emission monitors, conduct an
initial performance test of capture efficiency, and
continuously monitor a site specific operating parameter to
assure capture efficiency in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
63.826 Compliance dates.
(a) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an
existing affected source subject to the provisions of this
subpart is three years after the effective date of the
standard.
(b) The compliance date for an owner or operator of a
new affected source subject to the provisions of this
subpart is immediately upon startup of the affected source,
or the date of promulgation of this rule whichever is later.
(c) The compliance date for the owner or operator of an
affected publication rotogravure facility subject to the
provisions of this subpart, at which the construction of an
additional or replacement press, other than a proof press,
commenced after the date of proposal of this rule is
immediately upon startup of the additional or replacement
press or the date of promulgation of this rule whichever is
later.
(d) The compliance date for the owner or operator of an
affected group of product or packaging rotogravure or wide-
web flexographic presses meeting the requirements of
63.821(e), at which the construction of a commonly
controlled, additional or replacement press, other than a
proof press, commenced after the date of proposal of this
rule is immediately upon startup of the additional or
replacement press or the date of promulgation of this rule
whichever is later.
63.827 Performance test methods.
(a) An owner or operator using a control device to
comply with the requirements of 63.824-63.825 is not
required to conduct an initial performance test to
demonstrate compliance if either of the following criteria
is met:
(1) The control device does not need to be tested if:
(i) it is operating prior to [insert date of
publication in Federal Register];
(ii) it is equipped with continuous emission monitors
for determining inlet and outlet total organic volatile
matter concentration and capture efficiency has been
determined in accordance with the requirements of this
subpart, such that an overall HAP control efficiency can be
calculated; and
(iii) if a catalytic or thermal incinerator is used as
a control device, the continuous emission monitors are used
to demonstrate continuous compliance in accordance with
63.828; or
(2) The owner or operator has met the requirements of
either 63.7(e)(2)(iv) or 63.7(h).
(b) Determination of the HAP content of inks, coatings,
varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents and other materials
for the purpose of meeting the requirements of 63.824
shall be conducted according to paragraph (b)(1) of this
section. Determination of the HAP content of inks,
coatings, varnishes, adhesives, primers, solvents and other
materials for the purpose of meeting the requirements of
63.825 shall be conducted as according to paragraph
(b)(2) of this section.
(1) Each owner or operator of a publication rotogravure
facility shall determine the organic HAP weight fraction of
each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and
other material used in a publication rotogravure facility
using EPA Method 311. The Method 311 determination may be
performed by the manufacturer of the material and the
results provided to the owner or operator. If these values
cannot be determined using EPA Method 311, the owner or
operator shall submit an alternative technique for
determining their values for approval by the Administrator.
The recovery efficiency of the technique must be determined
for all of the target HAP and a correction factor, if
necessary, must be determined and applied.
(2) Each owner or operator of a product or packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press, or group of
presses controlled by a common solvent recovery system shall
determine the organic HAP weight fraction of each ink,
coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other
material applied using EPA Method 311. The Method 311
determination may be performed by the manufacturer of the
material and the results provided to the owner or operator.
(i) If these values cannot be determined using EPA
Method 311, the owner or operator shall submit an
alternative technique for determining their values for
approval by the Administrator. The recovery efficiency of
the technique must be determined for all of the target HAP
and a correction factor, if necessary, must be determined
and applied.
(ii) For the purpose of determining compliance with the
requirements of 63.825, the average organic HAP weight
fraction of all ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer,
solvent and other material applied on a product or packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press, or group of
presses controlled by a common solvent recovery system,
during each month shall apply. The average shall be
computed on a mass-weighted basis.
(c) Determination by the owner or operator of the
volatile matter content of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents and other materials used for
the purpose of meeting the requirements of 63.824 shall be
conducted according to paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
Determination by the owner or operator of the volatile
matter and solids content of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents and other materials applied for
the purpose of meeting the requirements of 63.825 shall be
conducted according to paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(1) Each owner or operator of a publication rotogravure
facility shall determine the volatile matter weight fraction
of each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and
other material used using EPA Method 24A of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A. The Method 24A determination may be performed
by the manufacturer of the material and the results provided
to the owner or operator. If these values cannot be
determined using EPA Method 24A, the owner or operator shall
submit an alternative technique for determining their values
for approval by the Administrator.
(2) Each owner or operator of a product or packaging
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press, or group of
presses controlled by a common solvent recovery system shall
determine the volatile matter and solids weight fraction of
each ink, coating, varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and
other material applied using EPA Method 24 of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix A. The Method 24 determination may be
performed by the manufacturer of the material and the
results provided to the owner or operator.
(i) If these values cannot be determined using EPA
Method 24, the owner or operator shall submit an alternative
technique for determining their values for approval by the
Administrator.
(ii) For the purpose of determining compliance with the
requirements of 63.825, the average volatile matter weight
fraction and solids weight fraction of all ink, coating,
varnish, adhesive, primer, solvent and other material
applied on a rotogravure press during each month shall
apply. The average shall be computed on a mass-weighted
basis.
(d) A performance test of a control device to determine
destruction efficiency for the purpose of meeting the
requirements of 63.824-63.825 shall be conducted by the
owner or operator in accordance with the following:
(1) An initial performance test to establish the
destruction efficiency of an incinerator and the associated
combustion zone temperature for a thermal incinerator and
the associated catalyst bed inlet and outlet temperatures
for a catalytic incinerator shall be conducted and the data
reduced in accordance with the following reference methods
and procedures:
(i) EPA Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A is
used for sample and velocity traverses to determine sampling
locations.
(ii) EPA Method 2, 2A, 2C, or 2D of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A is used to determine gas volumetric flow rate.
(iii) EPA Method 3 of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A is
used for gas analysis to determine dry molecular weight.
(iv) EPA Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A is used
to determine stack gas moisture.
(v) EPA Methods 2, 2A, 3, and 4 shall be performed, as
applicable, at least twice during each test period.
(vi) EPA Method 25 or EPA Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A, as appropriate to the conditions of the site,
may be used to determine organic volatile matter
concentration. The owner or operator shall submit notice of
the intended test method to the Administrator for approval
along with notice of the performance test required under
63.7(c).
(vii) Each performance test shall consist of three
separate runs; each run conducted for at least one hour
under the conditions that exist when the affected source is
operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably
expected to occur. For the purpose of determining organic
volatile matter concentrations and mass flow rates, the
average of results of all runs shall apply.
(viii) Organic volatile matter mass flow rates shall be
determined by the following equation:
(ix) Emission control device efficiency shall be
determined by the following equation:
(2) The owner or operator shall record such process
information as may be necessary to determine the conditions
of the performance test. Operations during periods of
startup, shutdown, and malfunction shall not constitute
representative conditions for the purpose of a performance
test.
(3) For the purpose of determining the value of the
incinerator operating parameter that will demonstrate
continuing compliance, the time-weighted average of the
values recorded during the performance test shall be
computed. For an incinerator other than catalytic
incinerator, the owner or operator shall establish as the
operating parameter the minimum combustion temperature. For
a catalytic incinerator, the owner or operator shall
establish as the operating parameters the minimum gas
temperatures both upstream and downstream of the catalyst
bed. These minimum temperatures are the operating parameter
values that demonstrate continuing compliance with the
requirements of 63.824-63.825.
(e) A performance test to determine the capture
efficiency of each capture system venting organic emissions
to a control device for the purpose of meeting the
requirements of 63.824(b)(1)(ii), 63.824(b)(2),
63.825(g)(2) or 63.825(h) shall be conducted by the owner or
operator in accordance with the following:
(1) For permanent total enclosures, capture efficiency
shall be assumed as 100 percent. Procedure T - Criteria for
and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure
as found in Appendix B to 52.741 of part 52 of this
chapter shall be used to confirm that the enclosure meets
the requirements for permanent total enclosures.
(2) For all other enclosures, the capture efficiency
shall be determined according to the protocol specified in
52.741(a)(4)(iii) of part 52 of this chapter.
63.828 Monitoring requirements.
(a) Following the date on which the initial performance
test of a control device is completed, to demonstrate
continuing compliance with the standard, the owner or
operator shall monitor and inspect each control device
required to comply with 63.824-63.825 to ensure proper
operation and maintenance by implementing the following
requirements:
(1) Except for owners or operators complying by means
of solvent recovery systems and conducting monthly liquid-
liquid mass balances, install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate according to the manufacturer's specifications a
flow indicator that provides a record of vent stream flow
from each print press to the control device at least once
every hour. The flow indicator sensor shall be installed in
the vent stream at the nearest feasible point to the control
device inlet but before the point at which vent streams are
combined.
(2) Compliance monitoring shall be subject to the
following provisions:
(i) All continuous emission monitors shall comply with
performance specifications (PS) 8 or 9 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B, as appropriate depending on whether organic
volatile matter or organic HAP concentration is being
measured. The requirements of appendix F of 40 CFR part 60
shall also be followed. In conducting the quarterly audits
required by appendix F, owners or operators must challenge
the monitors with compounds representative of the gaseous
emission stream being controlled; and
(ii) All temperature monitoring equipment shall be
installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated according to
manufacturers specifications. The thermocouple calibration
should be verified every 3 months, or the thermocouple
should be replaced. The replacement shall be done either if
the owner or operator chooses not to calibrate the
thermocouple, or if the thermocouple cannot be properly
calibrated.
(3) Owners or operators complying with 63.824-63.825
through the use of a control device and demonstrating
continuous compliance through a percent efficiency
calculation shall install, calibrate, operate and maintain a
CEM to measure continuously the total organic volatile
matter concentration at both the control device inlet and
the outlet.
(4) An owner or operator complying with the
requirements of 63.824-63.825 through the use of an
incinerator and demonstrating continuous compliance through
monitoring an operating parameter shall:
(i) For an incinerator other than a catalytic
incinerator, install, calibrate, operate and maintain a
temperature monitoring device equipped with a continuous
recorder. The device shall have an accuracy of ñ1 percent
of the temperature being monitored in øC or ñ0.5øC,
whichever is greater. The thermocouple shall be installed
at a location in the combustion chamber downstream of the
combustion zone.
(ii) For a catalytic vapor incinerator, install,
calibrate, operate and maintain a temperature monitoring
device equipped with a continuous recorder. The device
shall be capable of monitoring temperature at two locations
and have an accuracy of ñ1 percent of the temperature being
monitored in øC or ñ0.5 øC, whichever is greater. One
thermocouple shall be installed in the vent stream at the
nearest feasible point to the catalyst bed inlet and a
second thermocouple shall be installed in the vent stream at
the nearest feasible point to the catalyst bed outlet.
(5) An owner or operator complying with the
requirements of 63.824-63.825 through the use of a
control device and demonstrating continuous compliance by
monitoring an operating parameter to ensure that the capture
efficiency measured during the initial compliance test is
maintained, shall:
(i) Submit to the Administrator with the compliance
status report required by 63.9(h) of the General
Provisions a plan that:
(A) Identifies the operating parameter to be monitored;
(B) Discusses why this parameter is appropriate for
demonstrating ongoing compliance; and
(C) Identifies the specific monitoring procedures;
(ii) Set the operating parameter value, or range of
values, that demonstrate compliance with 63.824-63.825;
and
(iii) Conduct monitoring in accordance with the plan
submitted to the Administrator unless comments received from
the Administrator require an alternate monitoring scheme.
(b) Any excursion from the required operating
parameters which are monitored in accordance with paragraphs
(a)(4) and (a)(5) of this section, unless otherwise excused,
shall be considered a violation of the emission standard.
63.829 Recordkeeping Requirements.
(a) The recordkeeping provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart A
of this part that apply and those that do not apply to
owners and operators of affected sources subject to this
subpart are listed in Table 2 of this subpart.
(b) Each owner or operator of an affected source
subject to this subpart shall maintain the following records
on a monthly basis in accordance with the requirements of 40
CFR 63.10(b)(1) of this part:
(1) Records specified in 40 CFR 63.10(b)(2) of this
part, of all measurements needed to demonstrate compliance
with this standard, such as continuous emission monitor
data, control device and capture system operating parameter
data, material usage, HAP usage, volatile matter usage and
solids usage, that support data that the source is required
to report.
(2) Records specified in 40 CFR 63.10(b)(3) of this
part for each applicability determination performed by the
owner or operator in accordance with the requirements of
63.821(a) of this subpart.
(3) Records specified in 40 CFR 63.10(c) of this part
for each continuous monitoring system operated by the owner
or operator in accordance with the requirements of
63.828(a) of this subpart.
(c) Each owner or operator of an affected source
subject to this subpart shall maintain records of the
liquid-liquid material balances performed in accordance with
the requirements of 63.827 of this subpart. The records
shall be maintained in accordance with the requirements of
40 CFR 63.10(b) of this part.
(d) Each facility for which the owner or operator
commits to limit HAP usage in accordance with the provisions
of 63.821(a)(2) shall maintain records of all required
measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with the HAP
usage thresholds, including the mass of all HAP containing
materials used and the mass fraction of HAP present in each
HAP containing material used, on a monthly basis.
63.830 Reporting Requirements.
(a) The reporting provisions of 40 CFR 63 subpart A of
this part that apply and those that do not apply to owners
and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart
are listed in Table 2 of this subpart.
(b) Each owner or operator of an affected source
subject to this subpart shall submit the following reports
to the Administrator:
(1) An Initial Notification described in 63.9(a)
through (d) and 63.10(f) of this part,
(i) The owner or operator of an existing affected
source subject to this subpart shall include the amount of
HAP used during the previous 12-month period of operation.
(ii) The owner or operator of a new affected source
subject to this subpart shall include the amount of HAP
expected to be used during the first consecutive 12-month
period of operation.
(2) A Notification of Performance Tests specified in
63.7 and 63.9(g) of this part,
(3) A Notification of Compliance Status specified in
63.9(h) of this part,
(4) Performance test reports specified in 63.10(d)(2)
of this part,
(5) Startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports
specified in 63.10(d)(5) of this part,
(i) If actions taken by an owner or operator during a
startup, shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source
(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are not
completely consistent with the procedures specified in the
source's startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan specified
in 63.6(e)(3) of this part, the owner or operator shall
state such information in the report. The startup,
shutdown, or malfunction report shall consist of a letter,
containing the name, title, and signature of the responsible
official who is certifying its accuracy, that shall be
submitted to the Administrator, and
(ii) Separate startup, shutdown, or malfunction reports
are not required if the information is included in the
report specified in paragraph (b)(6) of this section.
(6) A summary report specified in 63.10(e)(3) of this
part shall be submitted on a semi-annual basis (i.e., once
every 6-month period). In addition to a report of operating
parameter exceedances as required by 63.10(e)(3)(i), the
summary report shall include exceedances of the overall HAP
control efficiency limits of 63.824-63.825 based on
liquid-liquid material balance calculations as required by
63.827 of this part.
(c) The owner or operator shall meet the requirements
specified in paragraph (b) of this section for any
rotogravure or wide-web flexographic press, or group of
rotogravure presses or wide-web flexographic presses
controlled by a common solvent recovery system that becomes
subject to the standards in this subpart due to an increase
in average HAP content of inks, coatings, varnishes,
adhesives, primers, solvents and other materials applied
above the HAP thresholds specified in 63.825.
(d) Affected sources meeting the requirements of
63.821(a)(2) shall submit to the permitting authority once
a year a report of the HAP used during a 12-month period
according to the following schedule:
(1) The first report shall cover the 12-month period
following the effective date of the standard and shall be
submitted to the Administrator no later than 30 days after
the 12-month period; and
(2) Subsequent reports shall be submitted to the
Administrator no later than 30 days after each subsequent
12-month period, provided that the HAP usage does not exceed
the levels specified in 63.821(a)(2). If the HAP usage,
for any twelve month period exceeds the levels specified in
63.821(a)(2), the report shall be submitted no later than
30 days after that twelve month period.
63.831 Delegation of authority
(a) In delegating implementation and enforcement
authority to a State under 111 (b) of the Clean Air Act,
the authorities contained in paragraph (b) of this section
shall be retained by the Administrator and not transferred
to a State.
(b) Authority which will not be delegated to States:
63.827 (b), approval of alternate test method for organic
HAP content determination; 63.827 (c), approval of
alternate test method for volatile matter determination.
Please e-mail any comments or questions to the Clean Air Act Information
Network.
Return to the
Clean Air Act Information Network Home Page