July 21, 1994
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Transition to Funding Portions of State and Local Air Programs with Permit
Fees Rather than Federal Grants
FROM: Mary D. Nichols /s/
Assistant Administrator
for Air and Radiation
TO: Regional Administrators
Regions I - X
I expect that during FY 1995 we will give interim or final approval to many of the
state and local operating permit programs required by Title V of the Clean Air Act. The
fees that result from implementation of the permit programs will significantly alter how,
and to what degree, state and local agencies use federal grant funds awarded under
section 105 of the Act. The agencies will no longer be able to use federal grant funds
for permit program activities. Also, the agencies cannot use Title V fees to provide the
nonfederal matching funds required by section 105.
In many instances regional offices will need to negotiate state and local grant
workplans and award grants for FY 1995 well in advance of the Title V program
approvals. EPA and grant recipients will need to develop operating procedures that will
facilitate a smooth transition from programs that now are funded largely by federal grants
and state and local general revenue funds to programs with major components that are
funded with Title V fees. I have summarized below general guidance to facilitate this
program transition. I have also attached a series of questions and answers that provide
additional clarification on certain aspects of the guidance including when grant funds can
no longer be used for Title V-related purposes.
Relationship of Title V Fees and Section 105 Grants
After a thorough review, EPA's General Counsel concluded that Title V operating
permit fees cannot be used to meet the cost-sharing requirements of the section 105 air
grant program.
Section 502 of the Clean Air Act requires that sources subject to Title V
permit requirements pay an annual fee, or the equivalent over some other
period, to the applicable permitting authority. The fees the permitting
authority collects must be sufficient to cover all reasonable (direct and
indirect) costs required to develop and administer the Title V operating
permit program.
Any fee required to be collected under Title V must be utilized solely to
cover the reasonable (direct and indirect) costs of the Title V program.
Since section 502 requires that Title V program costs be funded solely from
the fees collected and that the fees collected be used only for that purpose,
Title V permit program costs cannot be funded through a section 105 grant
and these costs are not allowable section 105 grant costs.
In order to qualify for cost-sharing, the costs incurred must be allowable
costs under the EPA grant. Since Title V program costs are not allowable
section 105 grant costs, the fees used to pay for them cannot be used to
meet the cost-sharing requirements of section 105.
Differentiation of Program Activities
Although the Clean Air Act outlines expected Title V program activities, a state or
local agency has some flexibility in how it designs its Title V program and fee schedule.
As a result, the specific activities that are grant-eligible and those that are fee-eligible
may vary among jurisdictions. EPA issued clarifying fee guidance on August 4, 1993 and
a grant-fee matrix of activities on May 31, 1994. I have attached a copy of the matrix.
Regional offices and grant recipients should use the matrix as an information
document and general guide and not as a prescriptive checklist for differentiating
between grant-eligible and fee eligible activities. In some instances, the same
activity could fall in either category, depending on the design of the state or local
Title V program. Further, the nature and extent of Title V and section 105 program
activities can be expected to change over time.
Until a state or local agency's Title V program is approved by EPA, that agency
has the option of using section 105 grant funds to assist in the development of its
Title V program.
When Can Section 105 Grants No Longer be Used for Title V-Related Purposes?
Once EPA has given interim or final approval to the Title V operating permit
program of a state or local agency:
The agency may no longer use section 105 funds for direct or indirect Title V
activities included in the EPA-approved Title V program.
The agency must clearly identify in its grant workplan which air program activities
will continue to be funded with section 105 funds.
If a section 105 grant has been awarded that provides funding for activities that
are part of the approved Title V program and no longer grant-eligible, the agency
must revise its grant workplan to eliminate the Title V activities and, if appropriate,
reinvest the freed-up grant funds in other grant-eligible program areas.
Defining Acceptable Content and Procedures for the FY 1995 Grant Workplan
Many regional offices and section 105 grant applicants have expressed some
uncertainty about the contents of grant workplans for FY 1995 where the state or local
agency expects approval of a Title V program during the fiscal year. In these instances,
regional offices may follow one of several acceptable approaches.
Approach A- Status Quo
The grant applicant develops a grant workplan that shows the full range of air
program activities planned during the course of the year. All sources and amounts
of funding are identified including the agency's operating permit fees.
Upon approval (or in anticipation of approval) of its Title V program, an agency
differentiates its Title V-related activities from the balance of its air program and
negotiates their removal from the grant. Regions and recipients also identify the
revised level of nonfederal support remaining for matching the federal grant as a
result of the removal of Title V-related resources.
Approach B- Expanded Program
As in approach A, a full activity workplan is developed. This approach, however,
expands the initial workplan submission to identify non-Title V program activities
for reinvestment or increased investment once the Title V program is approved, the
Title V activities removed, and grant funds are freed.
Investments and reinvestments would be subject to negotiation with the Region.
If the workplan has identified the changes in activities and the retargeting of
resources explicitly and accurately, a renegotiation of the grant may not be
necessary.
Approach C- Incremental
Where early Title V program approval is anticipated, the applicant submits a grant
workplan which reflects only those air program activities which are clearly section
105 eligible. EPA would provide an incremental award reflecting support for only
those activities.
Upon approval (or in anticipation of approval) of its Title V program, the applicant
renegotiates its award (or an additional award) with EPA to identify supplemental
areas of new or increased investment.
In all of the above approaches, every grant awarded to agencies with existing or
potential Title V responsibilities must be conditioned to provide that no activities that are
part of an approved Title V program will be funded with section 105 funds.
Recomputing the Maintenance of Effort
The Clean Air Act requires that all section 105 grantees must provide at least the
same level of nonfederal contribution as for the previous year. This "maintenance-of-
effort" or MOE level may include funding for activities that will become part of the Title
V program, upon EPA approval. Once an agency has accounted for the removal of its
Title V activities and resources from its section 105 grant workplan and agreement:
The agency may request the establishment of a new MOE level based upon all the
remaining air program activities that are recurrent in nature. I have attached an
opinion from the Office of General Counsel that provides the basis for allowing a
revised MOE level.
For requests that would lower the MOE, EPA will consider only those revisions that
are directly attributable to the impact of Title V.
However, an agency may still request an adjustment of its MOE because of a
nonselective reduction in state or local funding (i.e., a reduction that applies to all
state or local programs, not just to the air program).
Satisfying the Nonfederal Match Requirement
Some state and local agencies anticipated using Title V fees to provide the
nonfederal matching funds for section 105 grants and have no alternative sources of
funds to meet the required 40 percent nonfederal matching requirement. For those
instances where an agency is no longer able to provide the nonfederal contribution level
for a section 105 grant:
The agency may request a temporary waiver of the match requirement under rules
currently under development by EPA. I anticipate that these rules will be issued
before EPA's approval of the Title V programs.
EPA may reduce the level of the federal award accordingly.
Treatment of Ramp-Up Fees
Many jurisdictions have increased their existing fees in order to cover the costs of
developing an approvable Title V program. (EPA has also been supporting and
encouraging these efforts since FY 1991 through the award of section 105 grants.) Fees
generated in advance of Title V program approval but used for development of the Title
V program are generally termed "ramp-up" fees. Depending on the circumstances, in
individual cases this revenue may be used towards grant match or to subsidize an
agency's post-approval Title V fee schedule. Specifically-
Ramp-up fees that are generated as part of a grant agreement should be counted
towards an agency's grant matching and MOE requirements.
Ramp-up fees that are generated apart from a grant agreement but in advance of
Title V approval may, at the discretion of the jurisdiction, be used to subsidize an
agency's approved Title V fee schedule if certain criteria are met- the permitting
authority must assure that the fees were obtained from sources subject to Title V
requirements; were collected or were to have been collected over for a period
subsequent to enactment of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act; are
identifiable and available for unrestricted use; and are to be quantified and
incorporated in the agency's four-year demonstration of Title V fee adequacy. This
revenue cannot be used for grant cost-sharing purposes.
At its discretion, a jurisdiction may also use ramp-up revenue which was generated
apart from a grant agreement, and has been accumulated prior to Title V approval,
for grant matching purposes. Such funds, if used for grant matching, can only be
expended on activities allowable in the grant workplan. Further, these same funds
cannot also be used to cover the costs of an approved Title V program.
Treatment of Additional Fee Revenue
The August 4, 1993 guidance on state fee schedules for operating permits
programs under Title V notes that fee revenue needed to cover the reasonable direct and
indirect costs of the Title V permits program may not be used for any purpose except to
fund the Title V permits program. The guidance further notes, however, that Title V does
not limit a jurisdiction's discretion to collect fees pursuant to independent state authority
beyond the minimum amount required by Title V. Such funds may, at the discretion of
the jurisdiction, be used for grant matching purposes. These funds, if used for grant
matching, can be expended only on activities allowable in the grant workplan.
Ensuring the Fiscal Integrity of Grant Operations
Permitting authorities and grant recipients will need to ensure the fiscal integrity
of their grant and fee operations in order to avoid an inappropriate commingling of funds.
For grants, EPA will rely upon the provisions in 40 CFR 31 which covers standards for
grantee financial management systems including:
requirements that procedures for expenditure and accounting of funds be well
documented and enable the clear tracing of funds. This includes adequate
financial reporting, accounting records, internal controls, and budget controls.
The recipient's workplan must comply with all applicable federal statutes and
regulations.
EPA expects that each agency, if it has not already done so, will update and
maintain a financial management system to accomplish the objectives noted above. This
includes the necessary differentiation of air grant-eligible activities and expenditures from
those related to Title V. This should occur no later than at the time of approval of the
Title V program.
As I noted above, I have attached a series of questions and answers to provide
additional, more detailed guidance on some of the issues outlined above. I also will
provide guidance on any additional transition issues that may arise. I am committed to
ensuring a smooth transition as state and local agency Title V programs are approved
and to providing, to the extent possible, the funding that these agencies need to
implement the Clean Air Act. For further information on this guidance please contact
either Bill Houck in the Office of Air and Radiation at 202-260-1754 or Susanne Lee in
the Office of the General Counsel at 202-260-1484.
Attachments
GRANT-FEE TRANSITION:
QUESTIONS and ANSWERS
Office of Air and Radiation
July 21, 1994 GRANT-FEE TRANSITION:
QUESTIONS and ANSWERS
105/ Title V Programmatic Relationship
Q. What is the programmatic relationship between section 105 and Title V?
A. Section 105 air grants have been appropriated by Congress annually since 1963 to assist
air pollution control agencies (as defined in section 302(b)) in implementing programs for
the prevention and control of air pollution and in meeting national ambient air quality
standards.
However, Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act created an operating permit program
applicable to stationary sources of regulated air pollutants. It requires the owners of
affected sources to pay fees to the permitting agency to cover all reasonable direct and
indirect costs of the operating permit program.
Title V operating permit program costs will likely constitute a major portion, though not
necessarily all, of a jurisdiction's stationary source program expenses. The operating
permit program will be an integral component of an overall air quality maintenance and
attainment strategy. This strategy will also encompass activities related to non-Title V
stationary sources, area sources and mobile sources.
Since an important distinction has been made in the Act that Title V activities can only
be supported by Title V fees, significant changes will need to be made in how air
pollution control agencies fund a large portion of their air programs.
Title V Fees (General)
Q. How are Title V operating permit program expenses to be covered?
A. Section 502(b)(3) directs that all affected sources pay an annual fee, or equivalent over
some other period, to the appropriate permitting authority. In most cases this will be the
traditional section 105 air pollution control agency. The permitting authority is to
recover fees in an aggregate amount sufficient to recover all reasonable (direct and
indirect) expenses related to developing and administering the permit program. While
Congress set a presumptive minimum fee rate for permitting authorities to meet ($25 per
ton adjusted annually per the CPI), a jurisdiction may collect less than this amount if it
provides a detailed cost justification.
Section 105 (General)
Q. What are the nonfederal contribution requirements that a grantee must meet in order to
obtain or retain a section 105 grant?
A. There are two major requirements that state and local agencies must meet in order to
receive section 105 funds: (a) each agency must expend annually for recurrent program
expenses at least the level of nonfederal funds that it expended in the previous year (i.e.,
its maintenance of effort), and (b) pursuant to 1990 CAA changes, each agency must
cover at least 40% of the total recurring expenses of its section 105 air pollution control
program (i.e., the 40% match).
105/ Title V Fiscal Relationship
Q. Can Title V operating permit fees be used towards the nonfederal matching requirements
of the section 105 air grant program?
A. After a thorough review, EPA's General Counsel concluded that Title V operating permit
fees cannot be used to meet the cost-sharing requirements of the section 105 air grant
program.
Section 502 of the Clean Air Act requires that sources subject to Title V permit
requirements pay an annual fee, or the equivalent over some other period, to the
applicable permitting authority. The fees the permitting authority collects must be
sufficient to cover all reasonable (direct and indirect) costs required to develop and
administer the Title V operating permit program. Since section 502 requires that Title
V program costs be funded solely from required Title V fees and these fees be used only
for that purpose, Title V permit program costs cannot be funded through a section 105
grant and these costs are not allowable section 105 grant costs.
In order to qualify for cost-sharing, the costs incurred must be allowable costs under the
EPA grant. Since Title V program costs are not allowable section 105 grant costs, the
fees used to pay for them cannot be used to meet the cost-sharing requirements of section
105.
Q. If an agency already had an operating permit program in place which charged affected
sources a fee, is the Title V fee only that portion which represents the incremental
change (i.e., the increase)? Can the original fee level be used as a basis for matching
purposes?
A. Many of the activities and costs associated with a jurisdiction's existing stationary source
control program effort will become a part of its Title V program once that program is
approved by EPA. Title V requirements will, in and of themselves, likely generate new
expenses. The Title V fee must be based upon the entire range of Title V-related
expenses and not just the incremental change. No portion of the fees necessary to cover
the full range of Title V-related program costs can be used for grant matching purposes.
Q. Does this mean that a jurisdiction cannot charge a Title V source a separate fee to cover
other than Title V-related air program expenses?
A. No. A jurisdiction is free to charge a Title V source a separate fee to cover air program
expenses other than those which are Title V-related (e.g., for state-only requirements).
A jurisdiction may choose to collect this fee along with the Title V-related fee but the
fees must be clearly be differentiated for administrative purposes.
Q. Can fee revenue in excess of that required to meet Title V needs be used towards the
grant matching requirement?
A. The August 4, 1993 fee guidance for state Title V operating permit programs notes that
Title V does not limit a jurisdiction's discretion to collect fees pursuant to independent
state authority beyond the minimum amount required by Title V. Such funds may, at the
discretion of the jurisdiction, be used for grant matching purposes. These funds, if used
for grant matching, can only be expended on activities allowable in the approved grant
workplan. These funds should also be clearly differentiated from fees required to cover
Title V activities.
Q. How should permit fees which are collected in advance of Title V program approval be
treated?
A. Permit fees generated in advance of Title V program approval but used for the
development of the Title V program are generally termed "ramp-up" fees. Depending
upon how the fee provisions were structured, this revenue may be used towards grant
match or to subsidize an agency's post-approval Title V fee schedule. Specifically:
- Ramp-up fees that are generated as part of a grant agreement (i.e., used to support
allowable grant activities) should be counted towards an agency's grant cost-sharing
requirements (matching and maintenance of effort).
- Ramp-up fees that are generated apart from a grant agreement but in advance of
Title V approval may, at the discretion of the jurisdiction, be used to subsidize an
agency's approved Title V fee schedule if certain criteria are met. The permitting
authority must assure that the fees: were obtained from sources subject to Title V
requirements; were collected or were to have been collected over a period subsequent to
enactment of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act; are identifiable and available
for unrestricted use; and are, or will be, quantified and incorporated in the agency's four-
year demonstration of Title V fee adequacy. These fees may not be used for grant
matching purposes.
Applicable Activities
Q. What air program activities are eligible for fee coverage and what activities are eligible
for continued receipt of grants? Does there need to be a clear differentiation?
A. Activities eligible for Title V permit fees are delineated in section 502(b)(3)(A) of the Act
and in 40 CFR 70.9, the final Title V operating permit program rule. Although the
Clean Air Act outlines expected Title V program activities, a state or local agency has
some flexibility in how it designs its Title V program and fee schedule. As a result, the
specific activities that are grant-eligible and those that are fee-related may vary among
jurisdictions. Generally, Title V program activities are those which are necessary for the
issuance and implementation of the Title V permits. EPA issued clarifying fee guidance
on August 4, 1993 and a grant-fee matrix of activities on May 31, 1994. Since air grants
cannot be used to pay for Title V-related activities a clear differentiation will need to be
made.
Q. How should the Grant-Fee Matrix be used?
A. Regional offices and grant recipients should use the matrix as an information document
and general guide and not as a prescriptive checklist for differentiating between grant-
eligible and fee eligible activities. In some instances, the same activity could fall in
either category, depending on the design of the state or local Title V program. The
matrix can be expected to change over time as the nature of sources subject to Title V
changes and as new grant initiatives emerge.
Q. Can section 105 air grants be used to cover the development of a state's Title V operating
permit program prior to its approval by EPA?
A. Yes. Section 105 grants can be used to assist in the 'ramp-up' or development of the
permitting agency's prospective Title V program prior to its approval by EPA. To be
an grants-eligible activity, of course, the Title V ramp-up activity must be included as
part of the recipient's approved section 105 grant workplan. (Note: EPA has been
awarding agencies air grants since FY 1991 to encourage the development of the Title
V program and supporting fee provisions.) Until EPA takes action to either approve
(including interim approval) or disapprove an agency's Title V program, that agency has
the option of using its section 105 grant funds to develop its Title V program.
Section 105/ Title V Threshold
Q. When can air grants no longer be used to fund Title V-related program activities?
A. Once EPA has given interim or final approval to the Title V operating permit program
of a state or local agency, the agency may no longer use section 105 grant funds to cover
the reasonable direct and indirect costs of its Title V program activities except under
specific circumstances as delineated in EPA guidance.
If a section 105 grant has been awarded that provides funding for activities that are part
of the approved Title V program and no longer grant-eligible, the agency must amend
or revise its grant workplan to eliminate the Title V activities and, if appropriate, reinvest
the freed-up grant funds in other grant-eligible program areas.
Appropriate Procedures and Timing for Grant Workplan Submission and Adjustment
Q. What are acceptable grant workplan content and procedures for FY 1995 where a state
or local agency expects Title V program approval subsequent to approval of its grant
workplan (but during the FY 1995 grant budget period)?
A. In these circumstances, a regional office may use any one of the following approaches:
Approach A- Status Quo
- The grant applicant develops a grant workplan that shows the full range of air
program activities planned during the course of the year. All sources and amounts of
funding are identified including the agency's operating permit fees.
- Upon approval (or upon anticipation of approval) of its Title V program, an
agency differentiates its Title V-related activities from the balance of its air program and
negotiates their removal from the grant. Regions and recipients also identify the revised
level of nonfederal support remaining for matching the federal grant as a result of the
removal of Title V-related resources.
Approach B- Expanded Program
- As in approach A, a full activity workplan is developed. This approach, however,
expands the initial workplan submission to identify non-Title V program
activities for reinvestment or increased investment once the Title V program is approved,
the Title V activity removed, and grant funds are freed.
- Investments and reinvestments would be subject to negotiation with the Region.
Depending upon how explicitly and accurately the recipient has identified the changes in
its activities and the retargeting of resources, a renegotiation of the grant may not be
necessary.
Approach C- Incremental
- Where early Title V program approval is anticipated, the applicant submits a grant
workplan which reflects only those air program activities which are clearly section 105
eligible. EPA would provide an incremental award reflecting support for only those
activities.
- Upon approval (or upon anticipation of approval) of its Title V program, the
applicant renegotiates its award (or an additional award) with EPA to identify
supplemental areas of new or increased investment.
In all of the above approaches, every grant awarded to agencies with existing or potential
Title V responsibilities must be conditioned to provide that no activities that are part of an
approved Title V program will be funded with section 105 funds.
Impact on Nonfederal Contribution Requirements
Q. How is a recipient agency's cost-sharing (match) requirement affected by approval of its
Title V program?
A. In those instances where an agency is no longer able to provide the necessary 40%
nonfederal contribution level for a section 105 grant as a result of the transfer of air
program resources to the Title V program, the agency would be able to request a
temporary waiver of the match requirement under rules currently under development by
EPA.
Alternatively, if a recipient is not able to meet any of its match obligation because of the
removal of all of its nonfederal resources to Title V-- but the recipient anticipated that
it would be able to secure additional funding to return to at least the 40% level during
the course of the grant budget period-- the recipient could request that EPA defer the
recipient's nonfederal contribution until later in the grant budget period. The recipient
would have to expend its nonfederal contribution within the approved budget period.
If the agency fails to meet the cost-sharing requirements because a waiver is not granted
or the agency is unable to pay the amount of cost-sharing that has been deferred during
the budget period, EPA may undertake the corrective actions set forth in 40 CFR 31.43.
Included are actions such as terminating, or annuling the current award, or withholding
future awards.
Q. How is a recipient's maintenance of effort (MOE) obligation affected by approval of its
Title V program?
A. OGC has concluded that a grant recipient's MOE level may be adjusted to reflect the
transfer of activities previously funded through section 105 grants to the Title V program.
A state must maintain the level of effort associated with recurrent expenditures for
activities that continue to be funded through section 105 grants. OGC has indicated that
this principle applies to not only FY 1995 but future years as well.
Since the timing of Title V program approvals by EPA may vary and are uncertain,
adjustment of the MOE level may need to occur in the midst of a fiscal year and not
simply at its outset. Similarly, as Title V programs become fully implemented, further
adjustments to the MOE level may be necessary in subsequent years.
Q. Many section 105 recipients have been contributing nonfederal funds at a rate greater
than the required 40% nonfederal minimum. When resources related to Title V have
been removed from the section 105 equation, will these recipients be required to maintain
their larger historical matching percentage or only a 40% contribution?
A. This question confuses the matching and maintenance of effort requirements. If, even
after adjustment for the removal of Title-V related resources, the grantee's contribution
is at least 40% of the combined remaining nonfederal and federal grant funds, then the
grantee will have met the section 105 match requirement and remain eligible for at least
the same level of federal funding that it had been receiving before. This is the only
percentage requirement under the Act that a recipient must meet. Recipients are not
obligated to increase their funding contribution to restore what might have been a
historically-evolved nonfederal percentage above 40%. However, even though only 40%
is required to meet the cost-sharing requirements, an amount above 40% may be required
in order to meet the maintenance of effort requirement. Therefore, a recipient may not
arbitrarily reduce its remaining nonfederal contribution simply because this funding level
is greater than 40% relative to the total. This is because the amount of funds contributed
constitutes the new maintenance of effort level and may not be reduced.
Q. Can the MOE be adjusted for reasons other than the accommodation of the changes
brought about by Title V?
A. Yes. An agency may request an adjustment of its MOE because of a nonselective
reduction in the expenditures of all executive branch agencies (not just the air program)
of the applicable unit of government (e.g., state or local government). As part of the
revisions to Part 35, EPA is also considering other circumstances where MOE flexibility
may be needed.
Grant Fiscal Integrity
Q. Must a recipient continue to report its overall air program expenditures as part of the
section 105 grant?
A. To assure that federal funds do not supplant other available resources EPA can request,
as a condition for receipt of a section 105 grant, that a grantee describe all sources of
support for the entirety of its air program activities.
Q. What financial integrity requirements must each grant recipient satisfy?
A. Permitting authorities and grant recipients will need to ensure the fiscal integrity of their
grant and fee operations in order to avoid the inappropriate commingling of funds. For
grants, EPA will rely upon the provisions in 40 CFR 31 including requirements that
procedures for the expenditure and accounting of funds must be well documented and
enable the clear tracing of funds. This includes adequate financial reporting, accounting
records, internal controls, and budget controls. The recipient's workplan must also
comply with all applicable federal statutes and regulations.
EPA expects each agency, if it has not already done so, to update and maintain a
financial management system to accomplish the above objectives. This includes the
necessary differentiation of air grant-eligible activities and expenditures from those which
are related to Title V. This should occur no later than upon approval of the Title V
program.
Each regional office will be expected to coordinate its review and oversight of each of
its recipients' grant workplan and permit program submissions. MATRIX OF TITLE V-RELATED AND AIR GRANT-
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Use of the Matrix
The matrix should be read and used in concert with the August 4, 1993, operating permit
fee guidance issued by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, particularly the
explanatory cover memorandum. That memorandum sets forth principles which will help guide
the Agency's review of the Title V fee program submittals. The matrix does not reinterpret the
Part 70 rule nor the Title V fee guidance. Rather the matrix reaffirms those program activities
outlined by the guidance which are necessary for the development and implementation of a Title
V operating permit program and which EPA expects to be covered by Title V fees. Title V
operating permit program expenses cannot be eligible grant expenses.
Organization of the Matrix
The matrix consists of two columns of activities-- those which EPA considers necessary
for the issuance and implementation of Title V permits (and which EPA expects to be covered
by Title V permit fees)-- and those air program activities outside of Title V that would be eligible
for federal air grant assistance.
Activities are organized by functional or substantive categories that are common to each
of the columns in order to better illustrate the impact of Title V on the overall air program
operations. The categories used, however, tend to reflect the functional aspects of Title V (i.e.,
program development, permit issuance, compliance, etc.). Because some portion of over-arching
CAA activities like emissions inventory development, monitoring, etc., may be Title V-related,
some repetition may occur in the matrix.
The left-hand column of the matrix lists those program activities outlined in the Title V
fee guidance which are necessary for the development and implementation of a Title V operating
permit program and which EPA expects to be covered by Title V fees. Categories of Title V-
related activity include:
Development of the Title V operating permit program
Review and issuance of Title V permits
Implemention of specific CAA requirements applicable to Title V
Compliance/enforcement of Title V-related requirements
Administration of Title V fee program
Title V-related small business technical assistance
Other activity necessary for Title V operations
-2-
By contrast, the right-hand column of the matrix lists air program activities which can
reasonably be expected to remain eligible for federal air grant assistance. This list, while as
comprehensive as possible, should not be viewed as absolute. The categories of activity used
for grants-eligible activities include:
Development/revision of permit requirements for non-Title V sources
Permit review and issuance for non-Title V sources
Implementation of specific CAA regulatory requirements
Compliance/enforcement of CAA requirements not related to Title V
Administration of grant and other forms of assistance
CAA technical assistance to small business (outside of Title V)
General and emerging air program activity
For Further Information
Questions on the matrix should be directed to William Houck in the Office of Program
Management Operations at 202-260-1754. Specific concerns related to the eligibility of program
expenses for Title V fee coverage and to Title V fee demonstrations should be directed to Kirt
Cox at 919-541-5399 or Candace Carraway at 919-541-3189 in the Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards.
The Matrix has not been included in this on-line document. If you would like to receive a copy,
please e-mail the Clean Air Act Information
Network .
Please e-mail any comments or questions to the
Clean Air Act Information Network.
Return to the Clean Air Act Information
Network Home Page MATRIX OF TITLE V-RELATED AND AIR GRANT-
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Title V Permit Program Development
Other Permit Program Development
Design/development of operating permit program
for Part 70 sources including: preparation of initial
program submittal; development of implementation
agreement with EPA; documentation of resources
and legal authority; training of staff for Title V
program implementation; development of necessary
regulations, policies, and procedures; development of
modifications to program required by new Federal
regulations or standards; integration with other Clean
Air Act programs (including Title III/IV);
development of data systems for tracking Part 70
sources; development and oversight of local Title V
programs; development of model permits.
Development/revision of operating permit
programs for other than Part 70 sources.
Determinations of program coverage and source
applicability including: inventory of Part 70
sources; establishment of criteria for deferrals of
non-major sources, development of significance
levels for exempting required permit information;
development of capacity to emit restrictions for
avoiding consideration as major source (e.g., creation
of synthetic minors).
Identification of those sources subject to any
state permitting requirements other than those in
the state's Title V program.
Revisions to the SIP to the extent they are
necessary for the issuance and implementation of
Part 70 permits.
Preparation, adoption and revision of SIPs
necessary to implement permitting programs for
other than Part 70 sources.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Title V Permit Review/Issuance Activities
Other Permit Review/Issuance Activities
Review of permit application for permitting of
Part 70 sources * including: completeness review,
review of compliance plans, schedules and
compliance certifications; development of permit
terms and conditions (including operational
flexibility); trading and compliance provisions;
permit limitations; separation of state-only
requirements; establishment of permit-equivalent SIP
limitations; optional shield provisions; and actual
issuance of the permit. * (For the purposes of this
matrix, such sources include: Phase II, Title IV
sources; as well as major and non-major sources
deferred by EPA but which a state opts to
include in Title V).
Review of applications and issuance of permits:
* For non-Part 70 sources;
* For deferred sources during the deferral period
approved by EPA rulemaking;
* Covering state/local-only requirements in Part 70
permits.
Activities in support of public, affected State, and
EPA review of permits including: notices of
issuance, renewal and significant modification and
the opportunity to comment; holding of public
hearings, as necessary; review of public comments
and preparation of responses; documentation of
hearing records; and preparation of responses to
challenges on permit decisions.
Public participation activities associated with
permit issuance, renewal and modification for other
than Part 70 sources.
Post-permit issuance activity: following the
issuance of Title V permits- any revisions,
modifications, or reopenings necessary (including
analysis and processing necessary for reissuance);
and renewals of Title V permits.
Post-permit issuance activity for non-Part 70
sources.
Development of emission inventory compilation
requirements necessary for Title V permit
issuance, and any necessary equivalency and case-
by-case RACT determinations under Section 110 of
the Clean Air Act if conducted as part of the Part 70
permitting process.
Development of emission inventory compilation
requirements, and any necessary equivalency and
case-by-case RACT determinations under Section
110 of the Clean Air Act if conducted as part of a
construction or non-Title V operating permit
process.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Implementing Applicable
Requirements
Implementing Other Permit or
Regulatory Requirements
Title I
Implementation and enforcement of permits issued to
Part 70 sources pursuant to Title I, Parts C/D, and
PSD/NSR sources.
Implementation and enforcement of state/local
minor new source review (NSR) permit for a Part
70 source that is a minor source provided that such a
state/local program is approved under section
110(a)(2)(C).
Implementation of section 111 NSPS through Part
70 permits.
Section 112
Implementation of specific Title I, section 112
requirements through Part 70 permits:
* NESHAPs [112(d), 112(f)]
* 112(h) design and work practice standards
Development and implementation of specific
section 112 requirements through Part 70
permits:
* 112(g) modifications for constructed, reconstructed
and modified major sources.
* 112(i) early reductions occurring within Part 70
sources.
* 112(j) equivalent MACT determinations.
* 112(l) state/local air toxics activities that take
place as part of Part 70 process.
* 112(r)(7) risk management plans if plan is
developed as part of Part 70 process.
Title I
Development, implementation and enforcement of
state/local minor NSR permit programs which are
not approved under 110(a)(2)(C).
Implementation of section 111 NSPS that are not
part of Title V/Part 70 process including new
residential wood heaters (if not incorporated as part
of Part 70 at the option of the state).
Section 112
Asbestos NESHAP demolition and renovation
activities (if not incorporated as part of the Part 70
program at the option of the state).
Development and implementation of specific section
112 requirements affecting minor sources of
hazardous air pollutants.
112(l) state/local air toxics activities not within the
Part 70 process (i.e., urban area toxics programs).
112(r)(7) risk management plans or plan elements
not developed as part of Part 70 process (i.e.,
plans are developed prior to permit issuance, plans
cover sources deferred from Part 70, etc.).
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Implementing Applicable
Requirements
Implementing Other Permit or
Regulatory Requirements
Title IV
Issue Phase II permits and implement CEM
requirements after Title V approval including:
* Observe on-site tests of Phase II CEMs including:
pre-test meetings; review of protocol, records, and
data integrity; and verification of monitor
performance.
* Conduct Phase II CEM certification reviews
including monitoring plan and data acquisition
system review, and review of certification
application.
Title IV
Assist in implementing Phase I Acid Rain
program activities including:
* Develop infrastructure for implementation
(including- hiring, training and organizing staff;
installation and operation of data management
systems; and establishing links to national acid rain
data base).
* Observe on-site tests of Phase I CEMs including:
pre-test meetings; review of protocol, records, and
data integrity; and verification of monitor
performance.
* Conduct Phase I CEM certification reviews,
including monitoring plan and data acquisition
system review; and review of application
certification prior to Title V approval.
* Initiate Phase I CEM compliance activities for
sources missing deadlines.
* Participate in NOx permitting process @ Phase I
sources.
* Review, evaluate and act on Phase I NOx
averaging compliance plans.
* Assist in Phase I compliance activities through
field presence, oversight and support to EPA
enforcment actions including NOx.
Implement Phase II CEM activities occurring
prior to Title V approval including:
* Observe on-site tests of Phase II CEMs including:
pre-test meetings; review of protocol, records, and
data integrity; and verification of monitor
performance.
* Conduct Phase II CEM certification reviews
including monitoring plan and data acquisition
system review, and review of certification
application.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Compliance/Enforcement of Title V
Requirements
Compliance and Enforcement of Other
Permit or Regulatory Requirements
Compliance and enforcement activities (prior to
filing of an administrative or judicial complaint
or order) to the extent the activities are related to
the enforcement of a Part 70 permit, the
obligation to obtain a Part 70 permit, or the Part
70 permitting regulations. This includes:
* Development/administration of enforcement
legislation, regulations, guidance, and policies.
* Review and certification of compliance plans and
schedules for Part 70 sources.
* Conduct and document inspections for determining
compliance with Part 70 permit requirements and
provisions including the performance of necessary
analyses and support activities to verify source
compliance with Part 70 permit requirements and
provisions (e.g., stack tests conducted/reviewed by
permitting authority, review of monitoring reports).
* Review and observation of CEM monitoring plan,
certification tests, and certification application for
Part 70 sources.
* Review of monitoring data for determining
compliance of Part 70 sources including CEM data
and reports.
* Making requests to Part 70 source for information
before or after violation is identified.
* Preparation and issuance of notices, findings, and
letters of violation.
* Development of cases and referrals up until the
filing of an administrative or judicial complaint or
order.
Compliance and enforcement activities including:
* Determining compliance of non-Part 70 sources
including sources permitted as synthetic minors if
the state opts not to include these sources as part of
the Part 70 program;
* Part 70 sources following filing of administrative
or judicial compliant or order;
* State/local-only requirements on Part 70 sources.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Administration of Title V Permit Fee Program
Administration of Other Revenue Programs
Design and modification, as necessary, of fee
structure for part 70 sources.
Development, design, operation, demonstration,
collection, administration, and accounting of permit
and other fees for non-Part 70 sources.
Demonstration of fee schedules and projection of
revenues from fee collections from Part 70
sources.
Development, design, operation, demonstration,
collection, administration, and accounting of other
fees, charges and financial mechanisms for
overall air program support including meeting
requirements for receipt and retention of federal
air grant assistance.
Collection, administration, and accounting of fees
for Part 70 sources including costs of performing
self-auditing or audit by independent auditor of fee
collections and the adequacy of the fiscal
management of the fee system.
Technical Assistance to Small Business
Technical Assistance to Small Business
Costs of the Small Business Assistance Program
attributable to Part 70 sources including that
portion of costs related to:
* Clearinghouse on compliance methods and
technologies including pollution prevention
approaches.
* Establishment of CAA/small business ombudsman
and the provision of information on source
applicability, available assistance, and the rights and
obligations of small business stationary sources
under the CAA.
* Small Business Compliance Advisory Panel.
Costs of the Small Business Assistance Program
attributable to non-Part 70 sources including that
portion of costs related to:
* Clearinghouse on compliance methods and
technologies including pollution prevention
approaches.
* Establishment of CAA/small business ombudsman
and the provision of information on source
applicability, available assistance, and the rights and
obligations of small business stationary sources
under the CAA.
* Small Business Compliance Advisory Panel.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Other Title V-Related Program Costs
Non-Title V Permit Program Costs
General air program activities to the extent such
activities are necessary for the issuance and
implementation of Part 70 permits. These
include:
* Installation, operation, and maintenance of
emissions and ambient monitoring instrumentation
required in the Part 70 permit.
* Performance of ambient monitoring required in
Part 70 permit.
* Emission testing on Part 70 sources required as
part of the Part 70 permit.
* Modeling and other impact analyses required as
part of Part 70 permit.
* Development of emissions inventories required as
part of Part 70 permit (e.g., to verify compliance
with Part 70 permit provisions, to develop and
maintain permit fee schedule).
* Overhead and administrative costs directly related
to implementation of EPA approved state/local Title
V operating permit program.
General and source-specific air program
requirements necessary for the issuance and
implementation of a state operating permit for
other than a Part 70 source including:
* Installation, operation, and maintenance of
emissions and ambient monitoring instrumentation
required for non-Part 70 source.
* Performance of ambient monitoring required for
non-Part 70 source.
* Emission testing on non-Part 70 sources.
* Modeling and other impact analyses for a non-Part
70 source.
* Development of emissions inventory data for non-
Part 70 sources or to verify compliance with other
than Part 70 permit provisions.
* Overhead and administrative costs directly related
to the implementation of a non-Title V permitting
program.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
General Air Program Activity
General Air Program Activity
Preparation, planning, development, and adoption
of source-specific SIPs necessary for the issuance
of a Title V permit and implementation of the
permit provisions.
Preparation, planning, development, and
adoption of SIPs, including those for attainment
and maintenance of NAAQS, enactment of state
or local area-wide source regulations, and
enactment of mobile or area source controls
(excludes source-specific SIPs required as part of
Title V program/Part 70 permit such as
identification of synthetic minor sources). SIP
development includes: the conduct of analyses of
control options and demonstration of alternative
strategies and regulatory approaches; development
and maintenance of emissions inventory for
preparing attainment and maintenance strategies and
for assessing progress in achieving necessary
emissions reductions for attaining NAAQS; and
conduct of area or regional modelling to assess and
demonstrate options. Also, includes the
designation/redesignation of nonattainment areas and
other procedural changes related to the attainment
and maintenance of NAAQS.
Establishment, operation, and maintenance of
that portion of a multiple site ambient monitoring
network which is necessary for the issuance of a
Title V permit or permits (as documented in the
permit issued to the source or group of sources)
including any applicable source-specific NAMS,
SLAMS or PAMS monitor. This includes the cost
of purchasing the monitor; collection, processing,
management and review of data collected by the
monitor; and quality assurance of the
instrumentation.
Establishment, operation, and maintenance of
multiple site ambient monitoring networks
designed to assess overall levels and trends within
the ambient air including the EPA required or
approved networks for NAMS, SLAMS, PAMS,
urban air toxics, and acid rain assessment networks.
This includes the cost of purchasing monitoring
equipment; collection, processing, management and
review of data collected by the networks; and the
quality assurance of the networks and
instrumentation (excludes ambient monitoring
specifically required by a Title V permit).
Planning, establishment, and implementation of
programs for the development and training of
state/local staff to implement Title V and related
Title III and IV requirements.
Planning, establishment, and implementation of
programs for the development and training of
state/local staff to carry out Clean Air Act
requirements and Agency priorities not related to the
implementation of the Title V program.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
General Air Program Activity
General Air Program Activity
Mobile Source Programs
Planning, development, implementation, or
oversight of mobile source control program
required by Titles I & II of the Clean Air Act
including:
* Development of emissions inventories for mobile
sources.
* Planning, development and oversight of basic and
enhanced motor vehicle inspection/ maintenance
(implementation should be paid by vehicle
inspection fees).
* Planning, development and oversight of
oxygenated and alternative fuels programs for
motor vehicles (implementation expected to be paid
by non-grant/private sector resources).
* Planning, development and oversight of clean
vehicle programs (implementation expected to be
paid by non-grant/private sector resources).
* Development and enforcement of Stage I and
Stage II vapor recovery/ refueling programs for
motor vehicle fuels including tanker truck
inspections (installation of controls expected to be
paid by non-grant/private sector resources).
* Integration of transportation and air-quality
related planning activities including transportation-
air quality analyses and determinations of
transportation conformity.
* Planning, development, and oversight of
transportation control measures (implementation
expected to be paid by non-grant/private or other
public sector resources).
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
General Air Program Activity
General Air Program Activity
Environmental Compatibility
* State/local review of assurances by federal entities
as to the general conformity of their activities with
an approved state implementation plan (40 CFR 93
Subpart A); state/local determination of conformity
of their federally-assisted actions (40 CFR 51).
* Environmental impact review.
* Land use and air quality analyses.
Emerging Activities and Programs
Emerging Activities and Programs
* Public education and outreach concerning
implementation of the Title V program.
Planning, development, implementation of
emerging programs and initiatives required by
the Clean Air Act or agency priorities including:
* Public education and outreach concerning the
overall provisions of the Clean Air Act and the
specific provisions required for implementation of
non-Title V provisions.
* Planning and implementation of specific
geographic or ecosystem approaches (including
multi-media support) and studies for addressing
specific air pollution problems within defined
geographic areas.
* Planning and implementation of pollution
prevention initiatives and strategies, market-based
approaches, risk analysis, not directly related to
implementation of a Title V permit to a specific Part
70 source.
* Promotion of public/private partnerships for
addressing specific air pollution problems.
TITLE V PERMIT FEE ACTIVITIES
AIR GRANT ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Emerging Activities and Programs
Emerging Activities and Programs
* Future determinations will need to be made about
the applicability of this matrix to those Indian Tribes
which administer EPA-approved operating permit
programs.
* Development and implementation of voluntary
programs for reducing air pollution and/or
addressing specific risks including indoor air, green
programs, and other voluntary energy conservation
programs.
* Programs for assessing air quality maintenance/ air
pollution control needs and for the development and
implementation of air quality programs on Indian
lands.
* Programs for improving the transfer and
exchange of programmatic and technical
information among state and local programs
including information on emerging and innovative
technologies.
* Innovative personnel programs to promote
sharing of expertise and knowledge among state,
local, and federal agencies.
* Development of state programs for control of
ozone depleting substances; and for control of
carbon dioxide emissions.
* Support for regional associations of states and
interstate pollution control compacts.
* Participation in international studies, programs,
and agreements.